Tag Archives: State Government

Murder, HIV and Mothers

Is it just me, or are the GOP crazies getting crazier every day?  I mean, I always knew there were some nucking futs out there, but it is a story like this that really hammers it home.  

Democrats were outraged Wednesday morning when Republican state Sen. Dave Schultheis said he planned to vote against a bill to require HIV tests for pregnant women because the disease “stems from sexual promiscuity” and he didn’t think the Legislature should “remove the negative consequences that take place from poor behavior and unacceptable behavior.” The Colorado Springs lawmaker then proceeded to cast the lone vote against SB 179, which passed 32-1 and moves on to the House.

I would just love to hear the Republican’s take on this.  If anyone finds one, please send it to me and I’ll add it.  Below is a transcript (done by the Colorado Independent) of this audio clip.

 

Thank you, Madam President. You know, this was a difficult bill for me. I voted yes in committee on it because of discussions surrounding the fact that — well, let me just basically say this, it basically modifies the communicable disease laws and it requires the health care providers to test pregnant women for HIV unless they opt out. And that’s basically, that’s the main part of this bill. I voted yes on it. I was a little bit troubled with my vote and was just wondering what was bothering me. I woke up the next morning — Thursday morning — at 5 a.m. and I wrestled with this bill for another hour from 5 to 6 and finally came to the conclusion I’m going to be a no vote on this. I’m trying to think through what the role of government is here. And I am not convinced that part of the role of government should be to protect individuals from the negative consequences of their actions.

Sexual promiscuity, we know, causes a lot of problems in our state, one of which, obviously, is the contraction of HIV. And we have other programs that deal with the negative consequences — we put up part of our high schools where we allow students maybe 13 years old who put their child in a small daycare center there.

We do things continually to remove the negative consequences that take place from poor behavior and unacceptable behavior, quite frankly, and I don’t think that’s the role of this body.

As a result of that I finally came to the conclusion I would have to be a no vote on this because this stems from sexual promiscuity for the most part, and I just can’t vote on this bill and I wanted to explain to this body why I was going to be a no vote on this.

 

Also, in a quote coming late in the day is something that is causing me to lose faith in humanity.  This was said by a state senator.  Please keep that in mind while reading it.

“What I’m hoping is that, yes, that person may have AIDS, have it seriously as a baby and when they grow up, but the mother will begin to feel guilt as a result of that,” he said. “The family will see the negative consequences of that promiscuity and it may make a number of people over the coming years begin to realize that there are negative consequences and maybe they should adjust their behavior.”

I have no words.  I really don’t.  This coming only days after  Republican Sen. Scott Renfroe compared homosexuality to murder in a debate over a bill sponsored by Veiga that would expand health benefits to same-sex partners of state employees.  Video to his words below.

Besides that whole “separation of church and state” nonsense being ignored, how the hell did this man, who seems unable to put a sentence together, get elected?

Crossposted at Feministing Community and it made the front page of Feministing!

Advertisements